Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:42
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Anthony Richardson says his shoulder is ready to go for training camp - NBC Sports
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Is Taylor Swift aware of the fact that she’s naturally seductive?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Genetic and biological clues point to inflammation’s role in mental health - PsyPost
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Smoking Rates by Country and Gender in 2025 - Visual Capitalist
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Stunning and mysterious 'red sprite' lightning storm captured in photos - Earth.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Northern Lights Alert: 8 States May See Aurora Borealis Monday Night - Forbes